|
DOCUMENT VI.
ALEXIUS I COMNENUS
A letter which
bears the date 1095 falls next under our purview. It
purports to be an invitation sent by Byzantine Emperor
Alexius I Comnenus (1081‑1118) to his friend Robert the
Frisian, Count of the Flemings (1071‑1093) and to all the
princes of the realm (the Holy Roman Empire?). The letter
announces that the Greek Empire was under constant siege
throughout by Patzinaks and Turks and bemoans the
attrocities perpetrated by these pagans. They are, it goes
on, lately invading the area of Constantinople itself and
will soon take the capital. Alexius then asserts that he
prefers that the capital should be captured (sic) by western
Christian knights rather than by the abominable Turks,
moreso because the city houses great treasures as well as
the precious relics of the Lord. These are then named, and
include, unequivocally for the first time in these sources,
“the linen cloths found in the sepulchre after his
resurrection.”
To dismiss this
letter as a spurious piece of Latin propaganda virtually
making the Byzantine emperor beg for the Latins’
expropriation of the imperial relics during the Fourth
Crusade is to miss its significance as a Byzantine document
referring to the presence of Jesus’ burial wrappings in
Constantinople. Indeed, were it not for the enigmatic
Document IV, this letter would be the first such reference.
Most historians have agreed that Alexius would not have
written such words, but they also concur that this
epistula probably “depends on an authentic letter of the
basileus” written with another end in mind and that it
dates, variously, from 1091 to 1105.
Kurt Weitzmann
and Hans Belting have shown that by c. 1100 Byzantine
iconography had evolved a new style in the depiction of the
events of Easter: the threnos or “Lamentation.” The
contemporaneity of this epistula and the developed
threnos art in Byzantium is striking, for thus it
signals with a twin corroboration what the large burial
cloth icon of Christ must have looked like. Jesus is now
shown lying upon a full‑length shroud after being removed
from the cross; in many examples he is naked and with hands
folded upon his abdomen or over his loins. In addition to
this new mural art, Byzantine epitaphioi or
embroidered cloth, symbolizing Jesus’ shroud in the Good
Friday liturgy, show Jesus in full-length, i.e., in the
threnos attitude.2 3
Before the next
document from Constantinople may be studied, a group of
Latin texts should be considered. The Abgar legend had
already come to the West and was known to the Aquitainian
pilgrim Egeria at the time when she visited Edessa (ca.
394). Rufinus’ 5th c. Latin translation of Eusebius’
Church History included the latter’s Abgar account.
These early versions did not mention the image, but only
Jesus’ letter to Abgar promising to send a disciple to heal
him. But in a sermon pronounced in 769 Pope Stephen III
employed the story of Abgar--this time reciting the episode
of the miraculous Jesus image--to oppose the iconoclast
movement then current in the Greek church. He seems to
translate directly the received Greek form of Jesus’ letter
responding to Abgar’s request for a cure: “Since you wish
to look upon my physical face, I am sending you a likeness
of my face on a cloth . . .” With these words, the Pope
urges, Christ himself was advocating the use of religious
images.2 4
|