The late Dr. Max
Frei, a botanist and
Swiss criminologist took sticky tape samples of particulate matter on
the surface of the Shroud in 1973 and again in 1978 as a member
of the STURP team. The procedure
was simple. He took transparent adhesive
tape and rubbed it on the surface so that loose particles stuck to the tape for later microscopic and chemical analysis.
Among the particles collected on the tape were dust, pollen,
plant and insect parts,
blood from the blood stains on the Shroud, and loose fibrils of
the fabric.
Frei was severely criticized in
some quarters for his sticky tape methods. Others on the STURP
team had used a specialized tool to apply a minimum, exact, and
uniform pressure with a high grade Mylar tape. As historian Ian Wilson tells
it, "Frei, Columbo-style, took out of his pocket the sort
of Scotch tape dispenser that can be purchased in any
supermarket and proceeded to press pieces from this into the
Shroud with what seemed quite inordinate vigor." As it
turned out, Frei was right. The STURP sticky tape picked up only
one pollen sample and the special Mylar tape proved less than
satisfactory for microscopic work. Frei's tape picked up hundreds of
deep-seated pollen spores along with other particles that have
been examined extensively by many researchers.
Before his death in 1983, Frei had identified pollen
spores of 58 different plants, many that originate only in and
around Jerusalem and areas of the middle east that include the
ancient cities of Constantinople and Edessa. His
finding, however, were not without controversy. Some members of STURP were
not happy with methods. Other critics suggested that the pollens
could have been carried by winds or birds to France or Italy, and
there have settled on the surface. This notion of transported
pollen has since been shown to be scientifically implausible, if
not totally impossible. Frei's samples have proven
invaluable to many and his work with pollen has since been
confirmed.
The famous and eminent archeologist
William Meacham sided with Frei and endorsed his findings
calling the doubts of critics "unreasonable." In August of 1983
he wrote:
The
pollen is another case of empirical data subjected to
unreasonable doubt. Frei's pollen evidence does indicate a
Middle Eastern origin for the cloth, which is not too
surprising, as several other linen "shrouds" were
brought back from the Crusades as relics..as a marker, percentages would be
useful in determining the immediate environment represented by a
deposit but not at all in proving that certain types are
intrusive. The presence on the Shroud of a wide variety of
Palestinian and Anatolian species is ipso facto evidence of an
exposure to air in those regions, unless a similar presence can
be documented in Holocene pollen deposits or on other medieval
artifacts in France or Italy. It may be...that few STURP members give the pollen data any credence, but
this does not detract in the least from the hard evidence Frei's
work has revealed, especially in the identification of
halophytes found almost exclusively around the Dead Sea. Riggi
(1981), a member of STURP, has reported preliminary findings of
Shroud pollen and minute animal forms "extremely similar in
their aspects and dimensions" to those from Egyptian burial
fabrics.
It was up
to Dr. Avinoam Danin, a botany professor at the
Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Dr. Uri Baruch, a
pollen specialist at the Israel Antiquities Authority, to
confirm and expand on Frei's work. In a recent conference of
the Missouri Botanical Society in St Louis, Missouri, Danin,
speaking about the pollen evidence and floral images found on
the Shroud, reported that "In the light of our findings, it is highly probable
that the shroud did in fact come from this part [the Jerusalem
area] of the
world."
|
In 1983, Oswald Sheuermann, a German
physics teacher, observed what appeared to be patterns of floral images
on the Shroud. Subsequently, following up on these observations, Dr. Alan
Whanger, a professor at Duke University, also discovered what appeared to be
Chrysanthemum-like images to one side of the Shroud face. Working together
and with
detailed plant guides of Israeli flora, Sheuermann
and Whanger, identified twenty-eight
plants.
Dr. Avinoam Danin, confirmed 22 of the
plant images identified by Dr. Whanger and
Sheuermann. Of the remaining six identifications Sheuermann has
expressed confidence that 3 are probably correct and 3 possibly correct.
- All 28 plants
grow in Israel. Of the 28 plants, 20 are
known to grow in Jerusalem itself and 8
others grow in the vicinity in the Judean
desert or the Dead Sea area.
- Though some of
these plants may be found in Europe, 14 of
the 28 plants only grow in the Middle East
and never in Europe.
- Of the 28
plants, 27 bloom in the Springtime
corresponding with the Jewish
Passover.
-
Zygophyllum dumosum, for which there is pollen as well
as an image, grows only in Israel, Jordan,
and the Sinai.
|
|
| The British
Broadcast Company (BBC) reported on the recent conference of
the Missouri Botanical Society:
Professor Avinoam Danin of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem
said an examination of pollen traces and floral imprints
suggested that they could only have come from plants growing in
a restricted area around Jerusalem and could date back to
Jesus's time.
He said: "This combination of flowers can be found in only
one region of the world. The evidence clearly points to a floral
grouping from the area surrounding Jerusalem."
The pollen grains were collected from the shroud some years
ago.
His researchers also said a type of pollen from a thistle
visible near the shoulder of the man's image on the shroud was
believed to have come from the plant used for Jesus's crown of
thorns.
Two pollen grains of this same species were also found on the
another relic, the Sudarium of Oviedo, which is widely believed
to have been Jesus's face cloth at his burial.
That has been traced back to the 1st Century.
|
|