New: Tough Questions for Skeptics and Believers

The image is a single color, a yellowing or discoloring of individual fibers.

When you look at the Shroud's fabric you see that each thread is made up of hundreds of tiny fibers. These fibers are about 15 microns in diameter,  a fraction if the thickness of human hair. 

The cloth has discolored with age which is a result of a chemical change of oxidation and dehydration of the fibers. Some fibers, however, appear darker in places along their length. This, amazingly, is how the image is formed. But it is not the fiber that has changed but a carbohydrate layer that coats the topmost fibers of the threads.

Scientists who study the nature of the Shroud's image commonly refer to the lengths of discoloration as pixels. 

Kevin Moran, who has conducted extensive microscopic evaluation of Shroud fibers, tells us that the discrete lengths of discolored fiber can vary from a millimeter long to less than 200 microns (0.2 millimeters) in length. Moran has concluded that the image discoloration is about 30% darker than the rest of the Shroud. 

Significantly...

  • the darkened length of fibers are only on the topmost fibers and not on fibers below another fiber or under a blood stain. Had a liquid been applied to the fabric to create the image to it would have soaked through to lower fibers. Because there is no image below the blood stains (which are soaked into the fabric), the blood must have been on the Shroud before the image was created.

  • the discoloration is a chemical change to the carbohydrate coating, nominally about 180 to 600 nanometers thick. That is about the same thickness as the transparent and invisible scratch proof coating on eye glasses. It is not a colorant in the fiber nor on it. Nor is there any wicking, matting, puddling, or signs of capillarity which would be evident if a chemical agent were used to cause the chemical change

  • there is only one spectral color of image discoloration. What we perceive as lighter and darker shades of straw-yellow is primarily due to the number of pixels or the relative length of pixels in any given area of the cloth. This is not unlike halftone pictures in newspapers and magazines.
 

  Tough Questions: Chemistry of the Image  


A microscopic photograph (200x magnification) of image fibers from the tape samples of particles collected by Max Frei. Photo is by Kevin Moran. 

In an article, "Optically Terminated Image Pixels Observed on Frei 1978 Samples," Kevin Moran describes the image pixels:

The individual image pixels have very sharp boundaries at their ends across the 15-micron diameter of the fibers. When seen at a magnification of 200 power, these pixels show uniformly darkened area over the natural color of the non-imaged fiber. At the boundary between the image pixel and the clear fiber, there is a sharp change. There is no gradual edge as expected from a shadow mask or external light source...

The fact that the pixels don’t fluoresce suggests that the conversion to their now brittle dehydrated state occurred instantly and completely so no partial products remain to be activated by the ultraviolet light. This suggests a quantum event where a finite amount of energy transferred abruptly.

Physicist John P. Jackson, has shown that the image appears to be perpendicular to gravity. There is no sideways or angled image formation. For instance, there is no image of the top of the head. The image also seems to exist only where the cloth was within 3.5 centimeters of the body.

The image appears darker where the cloth was closer to the body. Thus, proximity of body and cloth results in more pixels or longer pixels. 

One explanation, that some scientists have offered, is that some, yet unknown, form of  radiation was emitted from the body with enough intensity to chemically alter the fiber. Kevin Moran states it this way:

The unique front-and-back–only image can be best described as gravitationally collimated. The radiation that made the image acted perfectly parallel to gravity. There is no side image. The radiation is parallel to gravity and, if moving at light speed, only lasted about 100 picoseconds. It is particulate in nature, colliding only with some of the fibers.

It is not a continuum or spherical-front radiation that made the image, as visible or UV light. It is not the X-ray radiation that obeys the one over R squared law that we are so accustomed to in medicine. It is more unique.

It is suggested that the image was formed when a high-energy particle struck the fiber and released radiation within the fiber at a speed greater that the local speed of light. Since the fiber acts as a light pipe, this energy moved out through the fiber until it encountered an optical discontinuity, then it slowed to the local speed of light and dispersed.

Other scientist disagree and suggest a Maillard chemical reaction between heavy amines produced by the body and the carbohydrate layer coating the fibers. See Tough Questions: Chemistry of the Image.

 

  Search Shroud.com

It is inconceivable that a forger or artist would create such an image of microscopic pixels all of one color. Dot painting, while not new, is not microscopic. 
   

   Open Letter to John Dominic Crossan

   TOPICS ON THIS WEBSITE:

© Copyright 2000 Daniel R. Porter. All Rights Reserved.

Home        Resources       Privacy       About