PREVIOUS    NEXT
 

Objective History

Science is not the only field of study in which we find this type of problem in the classroom. Objective history challenges scripture as history. It raises serious questions about early church history and cherished beliefs about our religious traditions. My sympathy lies with the teacher. His job is not easy in a secular school system populated with students from a rich cultural mix of religious beliefs. But the difficulty that Molly was having with her teacher was not of this sort. The shroud may have figured into her religious beliefs—I honestly don’t know for she didn’t tell me. But that was not the issue she was raising. She was arguing that new scientific evidence challenged an earlier scientific conclusion. “Science,” wrote biochemist Émile Duclaux (1840-1904), over a century ago, is “a series of judgments, revised without ceasing.” History bears that out. Molly knew that.

 

PREVIOUS    NEXT

 

The Flat Earth Society
Yet attempts to prove the shroud is fake continue. Why?
The Shadow Shroud
Garlaschelli’s  Shroud
Dictionary
Molly from Alaska
The Problem of Curriculum
Objective History
The Shroud is a religious object
Russell Kirk
John A. T. Robinson
Dematerialization
Finally, a clear explanation for the carbon dating
Joe and Lenny
Father Joe on Reason
The Shroud is Irrelevent?
Shroudoids and Skeptoids
Colossus of Rhodes
Lenny’s Opinions
Richard Dawkins on the Shroud
Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence
Dawkins Should Know Better
Historians and the Lack of Evidence
But where are the records for it in
The Mummy at the Georges Labit Museum in Toulouse
Historical Evidence and Scientific Evidence
Raymond N. Rogers
Rogers in Turin
The Lunatic Fringe
Benford and Marino Onto Something
Letter to the Editors of
Joe Nickell: Sour Grapes
Jack of All Trades
Skeptics Dictionary More Closely
Not Proof