PREVIOUS    NEXT
 

Dictionary

Skeptics

Dictionary

Each attempt to reproduce the images presumed that the carbon dating was correct. When it became obvious, to some, that  the cloth was very much older, some skeptics modified their stance. Robert Carroll, in his popular, thorough and well written Skeptics Dictionary, wrote, “Of course, the cloth might be 3,000 or 2,000 years old . . . but the image on the cloth could date from a much later period. (1)

Wilson commented along the same lines, “However, it [new evidence about the age of the cloth] doesn't impact my theory much at all. A handy place for some profiteering villain to grab a good burial shroud for purposes of forgery, is from a tomb in Palestine. . . . a BC date won't necessarily toss the Shadow Theory.” (2)

Others were seemingly unaware that serious research was being published in the recondite, specialized, peer-reviewed journals of science; articles that proved that the carbon dating was invalid and articles that characterized the chemistry and physical attributes of the images.

 

PREVIOUS    NEXT

 

The Flat Earth Society
Yet attempts to prove the shroud is fake continue. Why?
The Shadow Shroud
Garlaschelli’s  Shroud
Dictionary
Molly from Alaska
The Problem of Curriculum
Objective History
The Shroud is a religious object
Russell Kirk
John A. T. Robinson
Dematerialization
Finally, a clear explanation for the carbon dating
Joe and Lenny
Father Joe on Reason
The Shroud is Irrelevent?
Shroudoids and Skeptoids
Colossus of Rhodes
Lenny’s Opinions
Richard Dawkins on the Shroud
Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence
Dawkins Should Know Better
Historians and the Lack of Evidence
But where are the records for it in
The Mummy at the Georges Labit Museum in Toulouse
Historical Evidence and Scientific Evidence
Raymond N. Rogers
Rogers in Turin
The Lunatic Fringe
Benford and Marino Onto Something
Letter to the Editors of
Joe Nickell: Sour Grapes
Jack of All Trades
Skeptics Dictionary More Closely
Not Proof