Trusting Science
Intuitively, we trust what we think we know about science. For instance, we know that carbon 14 testing is regularly used for testing all manner of artifacts and so it must be right. We intuitively trust Nature, the very prestigious science journal, the British Museum, and three radiocarbon dating laboratories associated with academic institutions. We don’t think about it. We trust that they know what they are talking about when they “prove” that the shroud is medieval.
We also intuitively trust what we think we know about history. The first historically reliable documented record of the shroud dates from 1355. We can trace the cloth’s history, year by year, owner by owner, and place by place from that date forward. Any historical record before that date is a bit loose (which, by the way, was not uncommon for that time in history). Luther and Erasmus complained about fake relics. We think; it must be medieval.
PREVIOUS NEXT
Galileo's Problem
Trusting Our Own Worldviews
Worldview By Borg
Worldview Nullification
Trusting Science
Gary Viken
Biblical Archeological Review
The Most Studied Artifact in History
What We Cannot Ignore
The Real Flat Earth Society
Zetetic Astronomy: Earth Not a Globe
Trusting History
Those Who Knew Better
Those Who Misrepresent History
Who Thought the Earth Was Flat
How Wrong Information Shapes Worldview
Why it is so Hard to Believe the Shroud is Real
The Vinland Map
Jesus at 2000 Symposium
Looking At Evidence that Contradicts Worldview
Thomas Cahill