Inexplicable Results in Carbon Dating
Sometimes, erroneous results in Carbon 14 testing remain inexplicable. In most cases adequate reasons for improbable dates are found. Contamination, not properly cleaned from samples, can seriously affect results. Sometimes, newer or older matter is introduced into samples, as was the case with the caribou bones that had absorbed chemically rich ground water.
In the case of the shroud, three independent laboratories used a recently developed Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) method for measuring the date. AMS has proven to be an accurate measurement technology that does not require that large samples be burned, as was necessary with older radiocarbon dating methods. The labs used control samples to ensure proper calibration. The few anomalous results encountered during calibration were thought to be few enough to be within appropriate margins of error. Unfortunately, the labs used identical testing protocols, thus it was really only one test performed three times. They also used an identical unproven cleaning procedure on three snippets of cloth; regrettably all cut from a single sample. The single cutting was taken from a corner of the shroud, which was probably the most contaminated part of the entire old dirty piece of linen, and one that had been mended with new thread.
PREVIOUS NEXT
Biggest Carbon Dating Mistake
Twenty-One Scientists
Inappropriate Question
Without carbon there would be no life as we know
The Abundance of Carbon
Other Possibilities
Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Protista, Archaea and Bacteria
The Making of Carbon 14
Carbon 14 Has a Mind of Its Own
As soon as a plant dies it stops taking on carbon
Antoine Henri Becquerel
Marie Curie
Geiger and Libby
Carbon Dating: The Idea
Accelerator Mass Spectrometry
What Rogers Discovered
Mixed Reaction to the Carbon Dating
Conspiracy Theory Erupted
Cardinal Ballestrero
Dmitri Kouznetsov
William Meacham on Kouznet
And indeed shroud researchers, who for awhile
The Manchester Museum
Naked Mummies
Mummy 1770
The Manchester Museum Mummy Project
Garza-Valdes and the Mayan Jade Artifact
The Ibis Mummy
Conflicting Results
U.S. News & World Report
Garza-Valdes and the Scanning Electron Microscope
No Bioplastic
M. Sue Benford and Joe Marino
Rogers was Skeptical
Ray Rogers and Anna Arnoldi in 2002
Evidence of Dying
Several years earlier,
Lignin and Vanillin
Vanillin Analysis Significant
Rogers Exercises Caution
John L. Brown
Lloyd A. Currie
William Meacham
Ultraviolet and X-ray
Red Flags Ignored
Facts vs Explanations
Mechthild Flury-Lemberg a Holdout
Without a Trace: French Reweaving
Robert Villarreal from the Los Alamos National Laboratory
Chemistry Today Article
Tartar Relation
McCrone and the Vinland Map
Myths about the Vinland Map Persist
Trusting Carbon Dating
Inexplicable Results in Carbon Dating
William Meacham Summarizes