PREVIOUS NEXT
Twenty-One Scientists
Inappropriate Question
Without carbon there would be no life as we know
The Abundance of Carbon
Other Possibilities
Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Protista, Archaea and Bacteria
The Making of Carbon 14
Carbon 14 Has a Mind of Its Own
As soon as a plant dies it stops taking on carbon
Antoine Henri Becquerel
Marie Curie
Geiger and Libby
Carbon Dating: The Idea
Accelerator Mass Spectrometry
What Rogers Discovered
Mixed Reaction to the Carbon Dating
Conspiracy Theory Erupted
Cardinal Ballestrero
Dmitri Kouznetsov
William Meacham on Kouznet
And indeed shroud researchers, who for awhile
The Manchester Museum
Naked Mummies
Mummy 1770
The Manchester Museum Mummy Project
Garza-Valdes and the Mayan Jade Artifact
The Ibis Mummy
Conflicting Results
U.S. News & World Report
Garza-Valdes and the Scanning Electron Microscope
No Bioplastic
M. Sue Benford and Joe Marino
Rogers was Skeptical
Ray Rogers and Anna Arnoldi in 2002
Evidence of Dying
Several years earlier,
Lignin and Vanillin
Vanillin Analysis Significant
Rogers Exercises Caution
John L. Brown
Lloyd A. Currie
William Meacham
Ultraviolet and X-ray
Red Flags Ignored
Facts vs Explanations
Mechthild Flury-Lemberg a Holdout
Without a Trace: French Reweaving
Robert Villarreal from the Los Alamos National Laboratory
Chemistry Today Article
Tartar Relation
McCrone and the Vinland Map
Myths about the Vinland Map Persist
Trusting Carbon Dating
Inexplicable Results in Carbon Dating
William Meacham Summarizes
Mechthild Flury-Lemberg a Holdout
Mechthild Flury-Lemberg, who directed a controversial restoration of the shroud in 2002, was another holdout. During the restoration she had not seen any evidence of repairs and stated that “reweaving in the literal sense does not exist” and that any such reweaving would be visible on the back side of the cloth.
But the invisible reweaving art did exist. It existed in medieval Europe just as it does today. In a peer-reviewed paper presented at the Third International Dallas Conference on the Shroud of Turin in September, 2005, Benford and Marino explain why the repairs may not have been noticed. And they corrected Flury-Lemberg’s statement that any such repair would have been visible on the back side of the cloth.
PREVIOUS NEXT
Biggest Carbon Dating Mistake
Twenty-One Scientists
Inappropriate Question
Without carbon there would be no life as we know
The Abundance of Carbon
Other Possibilities
Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Protista, Archaea and Bacteria
The Making of Carbon 14
Carbon 14 Has a Mind of Its Own
As soon as a plant dies it stops taking on carbon
Antoine Henri Becquerel
Marie Curie
Geiger and Libby
Carbon Dating: The Idea
Accelerator Mass Spectrometry
What Rogers Discovered
Mixed Reaction to the Carbon Dating
Conspiracy Theory Erupted
Cardinal Ballestrero
Dmitri Kouznetsov
William Meacham on Kouznet
And indeed shroud researchers, who for awhile
The Manchester Museum
Naked Mummies
Mummy 1770
The Manchester Museum Mummy Project
Garza-Valdes and the Mayan Jade Artifact
The Ibis Mummy
Conflicting Results
U.S. News & World Report
Garza-Valdes and the Scanning Electron Microscope
No Bioplastic
M. Sue Benford and Joe Marino
Rogers was Skeptical
Ray Rogers and Anna Arnoldi in 2002
Evidence of Dying
Several years earlier,
Lignin and Vanillin
Vanillin Analysis Significant
Rogers Exercises Caution
John L. Brown
Lloyd A. Currie
William Meacham
Ultraviolet and X-ray
Red Flags Ignored
Facts vs Explanations
Mechthild Flury-Lemberg a Holdout
Without a Trace: French Reweaving
Robert Villarreal from the Los Alamos National Laboratory
Chemistry Today Article
Tartar Relation
McCrone and the Vinland Map
Myths about the Vinland Map Persist
Trusting Carbon Dating
Inexplicable Results in Carbon Dating
William Meacham Summarizes