PREVIOUS    NEXT
 

Threshold For Perceiving Images

I rather suspect that there is a rather fuzzy swath of undecidedness between certainty that an image is of a face and is not. But given an environment and a sane worldview we can usually avoid undecidedness. If we see a face in the clouds, I know it is a phantasm, an illusion, an apparition of sorts. And I am sure most of us think the same thing if we see a face on a piece of toast or in a smudge of a windowpane. It should be easy to know what we see given the context. Conversely, if we see a face in a Picasso, even if it looks less like a face than what we see on our toast, we know it is an image of a face because of the context. But what about the face on the shroud? Fake or real, by some unknown means, we know that it is meant to be a face. We don’t need the context. It looks far too much like a face to imagine that it is anything else.

 

PREVIOUS    NEXT

 

Testing History
Have We Missed Something?
Max Frei thought so.
Pollen Identification
Scanning Electron Microscope
Attacking Frei
Der Stern
Avinoam Danin and Uri Baruch
Baruch was Guarded
Threshold For Perceiving Images
The Situationist
Pareidolia
The Face on Mars
Things People See on the Shroud
Photons by the Millions
Dirty, Creased and Wrinkled
So does the banding patterns, the variegated appearance of
Photography is Part of the Problem
Fluffy Shaped Sponge?
The Lepton
Francis Filas
Points of Congruence
Barrie Schwortz on the Coins
Limestone Dust
Textile Analysis
Stitching
Variegation
The Making of Linen
Ancient Bleaching
Bleaching in the Middle Ages
It has been noticed that the Shroud of Turin—except
The Decomposition of Vanillin
Vanillin as a Validation of Carbon Dating
Making Sense of History in Context