Avinoam Danin and Uri Baruch
It would be up to Avinoam Danin, a botany professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Uri Baruch, a pollen specialist at the Israel Antiquities Authority, to try to salvage Frei's work. At a conference sponsored by the Missouri Botanical Society in St Louis, Missouri, Danin, speaking about the pollen evidence and floral images found on the shroud, reported that "In the light of our findings, it is highly probable that the shroud did in fact come from this part [the Jerusalem area] of the world."
But the problem was only compounded. The subject of floral images that Danin believed he saw on the shroud was being conflated with the Frei’s pollen observations because some of the plants were the same. That would be fine but many people doubted that Danin was really seeing these images of flowers. Danin wasn’t delusional. Others saw what seemed to be the same flowers. But, as we will see later on when we have started to understand the shroud’s images better, they may simply appearances of flowers.
PREVIOUS NEXT
Testing History
Have We Missed Something?
Max Frei thought so.
Pollen Identification
Scanning Electron Microscope
Attacking Frei
Der Stern
Avinoam Danin and Uri Baruch
Baruch was Guarded
Threshold For Perceiving Images
The Situationist
Pareidolia
The Face on Mars
Things People See on the Shroud
Photons by the Millions
Dirty, Creased and Wrinkled
So does the banding patterns, the variegated appearance of
Photography is Part of the Problem
Fluffy Shaped Sponge?
The Lepton
Francis Filas
Points of Congruence
Barrie Schwortz on the Coins
Limestone Dust
Textile Analysis
Stitching
Variegation
The Making of Linen
Ancient Bleaching
Bleaching in the Middle Ages
It has been noticed that the Shroud of Turin—except
The Decomposition of Vanillin
Vanillin as a Validation of Carbon Dating
Making Sense of History in Context