The Sudarium was Carbon Dated
There is a problem. The Sudarium was carbon dated and it came up short. It appears to be cloth that was produced about A.D. 700 plus or minus about 50 years, which coincides with the time the cloth appeared in Spain. If those tests are accurate and meaningful then the Sudarium cannot be authentic. There are some concerns about the quality of the tests that arise and a substantive lack of quality sampling, the provenance of the samples themselves, etc. Even Joe Nickell, its primary skeptic agrees:
It the tests were properly done on samples taken from the Oviedo cloth—an uncertainty, at this point—the cloth appears to date from circa 695, not long before the cloth was reportedly taken to Oviedo in 718. (32)
If those tests are accurate, how do we explain the extraordinary symmetry between the bloodstains on the Sudarium and those on the shroud. Do we simply decide that one is to be trusted and the other not.
PREVIOUS NEXT
Constantinople
Small Greek City on the Bosporus
Hagia Sophia
Constantine the Great
The Macedonian Dynasty
The Purple Room
The Fall and Rise of Zoe
Constantine VII, the Untypical Emperor
Curcuas Captures the Image of Edessa
The Image of Edessa in Constantinople
Alexios Komnenos to Robert of Flanders
Questions About Authenticity of the Letter
The List the Boggles the Mind
Robert de Clari
Accuracy in Translations
Saint Mary of Blachernae
The Habitual Miracle
McNeal’s Sudarium
The Sudarium Envisioned
Constantinople’s Vast Treasury
Two Cloths?
In this place He rises again
Man of Sorrows
Monastery of St. Panteleimon
St. Panteleimon Fresco
Hungarian Pray Manuscript
Portrait of an Empty Shroud
Is the Sudarium There?
The Real Sudarium?
First Written Record of the Sudarium
Mark Guscin
The Sudarium was Carbon Dated