PREVIOUS    NEXT
 

Finally, a clear explanation for the carbon dating

It would be several years before a clear explanation why the carbon dating was invalid would be published in a secular, peer-reviewed journal. It would take as long for hypotheses to emerge that might explain how the images might have been formed that was not paranormal, did not seem to violate the laws of nature, and did not assume fakery either. Dematerialization, as far as I was concerned, was beyond reason and not theologically sound. Even betting on the idea that no one had figured out how the images were formed was pseudoscience. I was now giving occasional lectures on the Shroud. After, one such talk at a nearby Catholic Church, I met two men who would profoundly affect my thinking about the Shroud.

 

PREVIOUS    NEXT

 

The Flat Earth Society
Yet attempts to prove the shroud is fake continue. Why?
The Shadow Shroud
Garlaschelli’s  Shroud
Dictionary
Molly from Alaska
The Problem of Curriculum
Objective History
The Shroud is a religious object
Russell Kirk
John A. T. Robinson
Dematerialization
Finally, a clear explanation for the carbon dating
Joe and Lenny
Father Joe on Reason
The Shroud is Irrelevent?
Shroudoids and Skeptoids
Colossus of Rhodes
Lenny’s Opinions
Richard Dawkins on the Shroud
Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence
Dawkins Should Know Better
Historians and the Lack of Evidence
But where are the records for it in
The Mummy at the Georges Labit Museum in Toulouse
Historical Evidence and Scientific Evidence
Raymond N. Rogers
Rogers in Turin
The Lunatic Fringe
Benford and Marino Onto Something
Letter to the Editors of
Joe Nickell: Sour Grapes
Jack of All Trades
Skeptics Dictionary More Closely
Not Proof